Will the upcoming generation opt for China’s rapid development and abundant resources coupled with stricter safeguards, or lean towards the more disordered yet open-ended American system where failure is tolerated?
As the United States and China intensify control over their individual AI sectors, an intricate struggle unfolds unnoticed. It goes beyond mere competition for hardware and computational power; instead, it revolves around defining distinct interpretations of being Chinese within technology, with significant implications for the future landscape.
At its core lies talent. The United States continues to be the primary center for leading AI experts.
27 per cent
Many top-tier AI researchers are employed there. However, almost forty percent of these professionals have their roots in China. An increasing number of Chinese citizens earning doctorates in artificial intelligence overseas choose to work in the United States, playing key roles in fundamental studies at organizations like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Stanford University.
With AI taking center stage in countries’ industrial plans, the international movement of professionals is not merely theoretical anymore—it’s strategically important.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with
SCMP Knowledge
Our latest platform offers carefully selected content including explainers, FAQs, analyses, and infographics, all provided by our prestigious team.
Many of these researchers cut their teeth in China’s rigorous education system, then crossed the Pacific to laboratories and start-ups in the US. It’s a dynamic mirrored at the
International Mathematical Olympiad
: the faces on the winning team – be it China, the US or Canada – often look the same.
Students of Chinese origin are not only dominating the winners’ platforms but also the pipelines, indicating that in disciplines characterized by deep technical expertise and international competition, one’s identity is progressively becoming borderless. This exchange can be seen even within corporations such as
Elon Musk’s xAI
, with at least one-third of the founding team having Chinese ancestry.
In the United States, researchers with roots in China are at the forefront of developing cutting-edge models, establishing multibillion-dollar firms, and sharing their work publicly. Among the boldest artificial intelligence startups include Scale AI, Covariant, SambaNova, and even
Zoom
– are headed by people of Chinese descent who have developed their professional journeys in Silicon Valley.
Meanwhile, China has achieved significant progress. It produces more STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) graduates each year than any other nation and has implemented AI extensively across various sectors, including urban infrastructure and consumer applications.
Alibaba
(the proprietor of the South China Morning Post)
Tencent
and emerging players like
DeepSeek
– which garnered attention through their open-source models – have shown they can create extensive language models that rival those worldwide.
In 2022, China claimed 61.1 percent of global AI patents, whereas the United States possessed only 20.9 percent—a stark contrast to 2010 when the U.S. dominated with 54.1 percent. This data underscores how China isn’t merely competing in the AI arena; rather, it’s significantly outpacing others through sheer production volumes. However, its stringent regulatory methods have faced backlash for their strict nature—the
Cyberspace Administration
implements regulations for generative AI, though the nation appears to be adjusting.
A increasing number of Chinese researchers and scientists are opting to come back to their homeland. Some do so to reaffirm their cultural connections, while others find that China provides the necessary tools, institutional backing, and expansive platform required to achieve significant scholarly and business objectives. The escalating financial commitment from the government towards advanced education has opened up new avenues at leading institutions, making these universities highly competitive in attracting international talent through merit rather than origins.
AI scientist
Zhu Songchun,
For example, he went back to China after heading the UCLA Center for Vision, Cognition, Learning and Autonomy. Currently, he leads the Institute for Artificial Intelligence at Peking University and is aiding in the establishment of the Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence.
Similarly,
Tingwen Huang
, one of the world’s most cited AI scholars, recently returned after two decades abroad to join the Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology as a chair professor. Research hubs like the
Beijing Academy of AI
and
Nanjing University
are also making serious plays to bring home top talent.
Even with these advancements, obstacles persist. Studies indicate that many Chinese AI doctoral graduates in the United States continue to opt for staying there post-graduation. However, this pattern could be shifting as China develops more appealing environments for returning professionals—especially those aiming for leadership positions or looking for sustained stability, which can sometimes be harder to find in Western countries.
In the meantime, the United States also faces its own set of problems.
“China Initiative”
, who has since retired, followed by a wave of
high-profile investigations
Even now,visa uncertainties and increased oversight have caused some researchers to be cautious. Ironically, it’s this very community—born in China but based in the U.S., with an international outlook—that both nations quietly depend on to spur advancement.
A lot of these professionals do not consider themselves players in geopolitics; instead, they view themselves as troubleshooters. However, their professional paths are now being assessed more often from a nationalistic perspective. This places them in an unusual situation—they possess fluency in multiple cultures and programming languages but find themselves constantly observed. The impact of what they create—and its location—will subtly influence the principles integrated into future technologies.
Perhaps the true conflict isn’t between red versus blue or East versus West. Instead, it might be rooted in generations or individual perspectives. Where will the upcoming cohort of Chinese heritage creators decide to establish their ventures? Will they opt for a setting with plentiful speed and resources yet stricter safeguards, or an untamed, unrestricted space where setbacks are tolerated, perhaps even viewed as learning opportunities?
Should the United States continue to attract talent and refrain from becoming insular, it could maintain an advantageous position. Conversely, if China transitions from cultivating talent to fully supporting and leveraging it, this might provide them with a more profound edge. However, the broader issue does not hinge on whose national symbol prevails. Instead, it centers around which interpretation of Chinese identity—incorporated within various systems, principles, and conceptions of advancement—ultimately shapes the future landscape of artificial intelligence.
More Articles from SCMP
The Hong Kong courts have invalidated the will of the late magnate Lim Por-yen.
Tesla stops bringing Model S and X into China due to tariffs making them too expensive, falling behind in the market.
Xi Jinping’s warning about the trade war, China’s anti-corruption efforts: SCMP daily highlights
China’s defense minister, Dong Jun, will travel to Vietnam for a military exchange and coordinated patrols.
The article initially appeared on the South ChinaMorning Post (www.scmp.com), which stands as the premier source for news coverage of China andAsia.
Copyright © 2025. South ChinaMorning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Leave a Comment