Fizz, a social media startup, files a lawsuit against Instacart and Partiful for trademark violation regarding its new app.

Posted on

Fizz, a social media startup, has filed a lawsuit against grocery delivery giant Instacart and party planning app Partiful over trademark infringement, as revealed on Thursday. The legal action comes right after Instacart unveiled a new drinks and snack delivery app named Fizz, which Partiful has incorporated into its platform.

Since its launch in 2020, Fizz has been targeting Gen Z and is currently used on over 400 college campuses.

This lawsuit was filed on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Fizz is seeking a jury trial, injunctive relief, damages, and a court order to prevent Instacart and Partiful from using the name “FIZZ” related to social or event planning services.

Neither Instacart nor Partiful responded to TechCrunch’s request for comments.

In its lawsuit, Fizz claims to have been using the “FIZZ” trademark since January 2022 and filed for trademark registration back in December 2021. The company alleges that Instacart and Partiful have committed common law trademark infringement, federal trademark infringement, cybersquatting, and violations of California’s unfair competition laws.

Image Credits:Instacart

The lawsuit asserts, “This new Fizz App by Instacart and Partiful is a blatant attempt to misappropriate the goodwill that Plaintiff has painstakingly developed through its continuous use of the FIZZ Marks among the Gen-Z demographic. Together, Instacart and Partiful are competing head-on with Plaintiff in its core market of event planning for the Gen-Z demographic. They could have chosen any name for their new venture, but instead of competing fairly, they are utilizing FIZZ.”

According to Fizz, Instacart and Partiful knowingly launched their app with the same name, targeting the same Gen Z audience. This risky move creates confusion among users, who may think this new ordering service is affiliated with or endorsed by Fizz.

Fizz further claims that Instacart and Partiful are capitalizing on its brand recognition as a well-known platform for Gen Z.

The lawsuit adds that “Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Defendant Instacart had a bad faith intent to profit from the FIZZ Marks when it registered the domain name . Specifically, Defendant Instacart knew or should have known of the FIZZ Marks and incorporated Plaintiff’s trademark and trade name in its domain name. In doing so, Defendant Instacart intended to divert consumers from the Fizz Platform’s online location to the Fizz App online location for Defendant’s own commercial gain.”

Moreover, the lawsuit claims that Partiful competes directly with Fizz in the event planning sector and is now leveraging Fizz’s name to mislead the Gen Z audience after failing to win their attention through fair means.

This recent legal action isn’t Fizz’s first encounter with the law; earlier in 2023, the startup sued rival Sidechat over unfair competition practices.